Federal Pay Freeze and Pay Cuts
Position:
In recent years, federal employees have been under constant threat of having their pay cut or frozen. Federal employees have already incurred $114 billion in cuts to their pay and retirement security within the last three years. Despite the fact that federal workers make an average of 35% less than private sector workers doing the same jobs, federal employees are still being targeted for cuts. NFFE-IAM strongly opposes these unfair proposals that aim to place a disproportionate amount of our nation’s debt burden on federal workers like VA nurses and doctors, U.S. Border Patrol agents, and USDA food inspectors. Three years of frozen pay is enough; the federal pay freeze should be lifted.
Background:
Early in
the 113th Congress, proposals are
being put forward to further freeze federal
workers’ pay. In March of 2013, Congress froze
federal employee pay for a third consecutive
year.
Federal workers have now contributed
$114 billion toward deficit reduction in the
last three years through targeted cuts to
civilian federal employees’ pay and retirement
security.
Contrary
to numerous myths contrived by non-government
sources about federal employee compensation,
federal workers are simply not overpaid; they
are significantly underpaid compared to workers
performing the same jobs in the private
sector.
Based on data collected by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, and reported by the Office of
Personnel Management, private sector workers
continue to have a significant salary advantage
over federal employees. This advantage has
grown significantly in recent years. In 2012,
private sector employees received 35% more
annual compensation than federal employees
working similar jobs. This pay gap not only
frustrates the federal workers at many of our
critical government agencies, but it also
discourages our younger job-seekers from
looking towards our federal government for
stable, competitive employment.
While
false reports of inflated federal compensation
and a broad focus on deficit reduction have led
to forceful calls by some lawmakers to reduce
federal pay, history shows that the underlying
rationale for reducing federal compensation –
that federal workers are overpaid – is not
based in fact. In every year of the last
decade, regardless of political party, the
administration in office has acknowledged a
double-digit pay discrepancy between federal
employees and higher-paid private sector
workers.
In fact, even before the effects of
large federal spending cuts had set in,
President George W. Bush’s President’s Pay
Agent certified a 23% percent pay gap. That’s
right; just a few short years ago, President
Bush certified that federal workers were
drastically underpaid. They were underpaid
then, and they continue to be underpaid
today.
To keep
our country on a sustainable path forward, we
need to preserve policies that attract and
retain the best American workers. Freezing or
cutting pay sends the wrong signal to the best
and brightest workers federal agencies need to
recruit and retain in order to continue to
provide quality services to the American
people.
Federal
employees are doing their part to lower
government costs, and have already made
sacrifices by accepting a three-year pay
freeze. The pay freezes federal employees have
already incurred will cost the average federal
employee $50,000 over the course of her
career.
NFFE-IAM opposes proposals to freeze federal employee pay for additional years. We also oppose other attempts to effectively freeze federal pay, like suspending within grade step increases.
Click Here for Printable Position Paper
