Republican Senators Introduce Legislation to Eliminate Federal Pensions
Monday, March 21, 2011(National Federation of Federal Employees)
Last
week, Senators Richard Burr (R-NC) and Tom
Coburn (R-OK) introduced the Public-Private Employee
Retirement Parity Act, S.
644, a bill to eliminate federal pensions for
all new government hires starting in 2013.
Under the deceptively named bill, new employees
would no longer receive the pension portion of
the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS).
Instead, workers would receive only the Thrift
Savings Plan (TSP) portion of FERS in addition
to their Social Security.
In a
statement released shortly after introducing
the bill, Burr claimed that federal retirement
benefits are excessive, and must be brought in
line with those in the private sector.
Unfortunately for Senator Burr, the facts tell
a much different tale. When examined closely,
it becomes clear that this bill has little to
do with parity, and much more to do with
unfairly targeting federal employees.
Claims
that federal pension benefits are inflated are
at best, wrong, and at worst, outright lies. In
fact, federal workers’ pensions represent only
a modest portion of the larger federal
retirement picture. For example, a career
federal employee who retires with a final
salary of $50,000 dollars per year and 30 years
of service will receive a pension of merely
$15,000 per year – hardly an exorbitant figure
by any measure.
The
reason that federal pension benefits are so
modest is because they were effectively cut in
half in 1983, when the government moved from
the old Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS)
to FERS. From then onward, new employees
received the smaller pension benefit, in
addition to the 401(k) style TSP account and
Social Security. Often referred to as the
“three-legged stool” of federal retirement,
these three small pieces coalesce to create the
modest retirement plan currently available to
government employees.
The result of this legislation would be to destroy federal retirement security and severely hamstring the government’s efforts to recruit the next generation of federal workers. With a retirement wave expected to hit the workforce in the coming years, slashing retirement benefits will make it much more difficult to recruit doctors, intelligence analysts, scientists, and other highly-sought-after workers into the federal service.
“These
Senators think they can pit young federal
employees against the old,” said Randy Erwin,
NFFE Legislative Director. “They
want to drive a wedge in the federal workforce
so that we will not rise up collectively and
make them answer for their shameless attacks on
federal employees. But we will not stand for
that.
An attack on one is an attack on all. We
are going to make sure that this divisive piece
of legislation goes down in
flames.”
